What about Pentecost?

14 07 2009

Q.  I was recently asked the question,`Did Jesus ever include the Holy Spirit when praying to God?` What would be an appropriate answer to this. ? This person believes the Spirit didn`t come till the day of Pentecost.

The Descending of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost

The Descending of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost

A.  The recorded prayers we have of Jesus do not indicate that He prayed to the Holy Spirit.  Jesus’ prayers were always addressed to the Father (again, that we have recorded in the Gospels), much as we now pray to the Father through Jesus, our intercessor.

While it is true that the ministry of the Holy Spirit was vastly magnified on Pentecost, it would be fallacy to assume that the Holy Spirit did not involve Himself with the workings of earth until that day.  Instead, we see Him at work first in Genesis 1:2, “The earth was without form and void, and darkness was over the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters (ESV).“  The ministry of the Holy Spirit was not dissimilar in the Old Testament to the ministry described in the New Testament. Consider that the Holy Spirit gave wisdom and revelation (Deuteronomy 34:9, Micah 3:8, Nehemiah 9:20).  It is obvious from these and many other verses that, much as He gives us wisdom now and did in the New Testament (John 16:13), He did so as well in the Old Testament.

Also, much as the Holy Spirit indwells believers now, He did so as well in the Old Testament with men like Joshua, Jepthah, Samson, Samuel, Saul, David, Elijah, Jerubbabel, Jeshua, and countless others.  Also, the Holy Spirit was and is an agent to bring about inward renewal of the hearts of believers (Ezekiel 36:26-27, Jeremiah 31:33, Romans 8:9-16).

The question then, to be asked, is this:  What significance is Pentecost?  While the Holy Spirit had ministered on earth before Pentecost, there was a difference in the scope and reach of His ministry.  The Holy Spirit’s empowerment was not always permanent (see Saul, Samson, Balaam, and consider David’s heartfelt plea for the Holy Spirit not to leave him in Psalm 51:11), and He only empowered certain people and for certain missions (consider that Samson was empowered by the Holy Spirit for the destruction of the Philistines, or Saul being empowered to save the people of Jabesh-Gilead).  In contrast, Pentecost was the fulfillment of a powerful prophecy in Joel:

“And it shall come to pass afterward, that I will pour out my Spirit on all flesh; your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your old men shall dream dreams, and your young men shall see visions. Even on the male and female servants in those days I will pour out my Spirit. Joel 2:28-29 (ESV)”

At Pentecost, the Spirit empowered ALL believers, as such people of all ages and positions in life would be filled with the empowering Spirit of the Lord.  Pentecost was the beginning of this great prophecy of Joel that continues to be fulfilled today in the lives of believers on whom the Lord’s Spirit and favor rest.

provided to www.gotquestions.org





An Anti-Christian Rant

27 06 2009

Martin Luther once said `Reason is a whore, the greatest enemy that faith has.`

Buddha once said `Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.`

Why are Christians so bitter? Are they unhappy with themselves and their bigot of a God?

Why does their God kill and show admonishment towards his followers? Is it because he has held a grudge since the times of Adam and Eve?

Why is knowledge sinful? Is it because their God`s word should be accepted without question?

Why are most Christians closed minded towards scientific breakthroughs? Is it because they are taught from a young age that reason and the ways of self faith are wrong?

Why should one blindly believe in the most violent and hateful entity in religion, if one cannot have the ability to believe in themselves and question the world around them?

Okay.  How to answer that?  Well, this is how I look at it:

One thing I would consider is this:  Do not consider one person, i.e. Martin Luther, the spokesperson for Christianity.  The Bible over and over again presses the issue of using our minds.  A few examples:

“You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.  (Matthew 22:37)”

Come let us reason together…(Isaiah 1:18)”

Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God… (1 John 4:1)”

they received the word with all eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see if these things were so (Acts 17:11).”

Far from being a religion of blind faith and ignorance, Christianity offers itself to be tested for its historical veracity.  As far as Martin Luther goes, while he made many commendable contributions to our faith, he himself was not without his own faults (bouts of anti-Semitism and the like), and I certainly would not evaluate the whole of Christianity based off of one quote that may or may not be being used entirely out of context.

Also, I would ask, what do you mean that “Christians are so bitter?”  Everyone succumbs to the weight of a heavy heart every once in a while, but to say that “Christians are so bitter” is a bit of a faulty generalization.  Many Christians are very joyful indeed. Indeed, however, there are some who profess the name of Christ with their lips only to embrace a different path in practice.  Those people should not be looked at as an example of the faith of Christ.  Also, I would ask why do you consider God a bigot?  After all, Peter says

The Lord is not slow to fulfill His promise as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance… (2 Peter 3:9)”

It is not God’s desire to kill and destroy everything that lives on earth, nor even is it His delight to eliminate certain races and peoples such as the Amalekites and the Ammonites.  God does not, however, tolerate unholiness, and a people as consistently wicked as those two examples (they sacrificed children to idols and engaged in horrid behaviors in worship to their gods) will eventually be given their just punishment.  To say that God is violent and hateful is to ignore the witness of scripture:

The LORD, the LORD, a God merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love and faithfulness (Exodus 34:6)”

The LORD is slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love, forgiving iniquity and transgression(Numbers 14:18)”

And he prayed to the LORD and said, “O LORD, is not this what I said when I was yet in my country?  That is why I made hast to flee to Tarshish; for I knew that you are a gracious God and merciful, slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love, and relenting from disaster (Jonah 4:2)”

There are 56 instances in the Bible where God is referred to as slow to anger, abounding in steadfast love.

Knowledge is by no means considered a sin.  Again, God wants us to reason.  The church was the sole bastion of learning during the Dark Ages, and were it not for the efforts of the church, learning would have ground to a halt and would have been forever hindered during those times.  Most Christians are not closed minded to scientific breakthrough.  However, many times science is used in the hands of those who actually distort the evidence to prop up support of doctrines such as evolution (look at the number of faked fossils, the amount of academic dishonesty that goes into supporting evolutionary theory) and Christians guard themselves against such faulty science and equip themselves with a balanced view on Science.

Again, there are 56 references in the Bible to God that say He is slow to anger and loving.  Faith is not a blind jump into an abyss of stupidity.  For myself, faith has been something that I have developed in time based on a realization that there is historical support for the veracity of the Judeo-Christian God.

provided to www.gotquestions.org





Do Two Wrongs Make a Right?

5 06 2009

The death of abortion practitioner George Tiller has been a very hot topic over the past few days.  Tiller was killed in church by an already apprehended suspect.  Tiller’s family released a statement saying that it was an abomination that Mr. Tiller was killed in a house of worship and that he was a man dedicated to the rights of women everywhere.  The killing has been reminiscent of the abortion clinic bombings in Alabama several years ago, and Mr. Tiller is the eighth abortion clinic employee and fourth doctor killed in the obviously hostile abortion debate.

I find this entire situation reprehensible on a number of levels.  For starters, I find it terribly hypocritical that while Mr. Tiller was a champion of women’s rights and viewed himself as being part of the solution, Mr. Tiller was most ostensibly a part of a huge problem.  The holocaust of abortion has far outpaced the holocaust of WW II, and all signs are that this holocaust will not be ended by any storming of concentration camps by allied troops.  Instead, this bloody stream of death and murder will continue unabated due to new legislation passed by Barack Obama, such as the Freedom of Choice Act, as well as various other actions taken by the newly minted liberal government.  While Mr. Tiller was so very protective of the rights of women (some of whom, arguably, were in the situation because of their own selfishness and lack of accountability), he was doing so at the expense of unborn infants, who, scientifically, are just as human as we are.

The unborn infant is not an organ, like a liver or a pancreas.  Rather, it has it’s own DNA, its own metabolism, its own ability to reproduce cells.  While it is dependent on the nutrition and behavior of the mother, in essence, no child alive can lay claim to any different state.  Whether the child must be properly nursed inside the mother’s womb or outside the womb, it is still entirely dependent on the mother for survival.  Therefore, it can’t stand to reason that the unborn fetus is philosophically or scientifically different from the born infant.  Because of this conviction, I find abortion to be one of the most reprehensible acts a person can commit.  Abortion is the murder of, quite simply put, the least capable of our society to defend themselves.  As a civilized nation, it should be a moral duty of our country to protect those who are least able to protect themselves.  Therefore, I find abortion to simply be deplorable and horrible an a scale incomparable to any crime commited.

With all these things said, I believe that the acts that Mr. Tiller commited as an abortion practitioner were heinous and despicable.  Anyone who can sleep at night after a hard day of murdering innocent children is beyond my comprehension.  I have to wonder how one can sit in a house of God and be okay with knowing that they are ceasing permanently the existence of someone who could potentially be part of the solution.  That being said, however, I believe that it was wrong to the worst extent possible to repay his acts with a grisly shooting in the middle of a house of worship.

I agree entirely that, due to his sin, Mr. Tiller was worthy of death.  Also, I agree that I am worthy of the penalty of death, as is the shooter who killed Mr. Tiller.  You see, there is no problem with the idea that George Tiller commited abominations before the Lord.  The murder of the least capable of defending themselves is an odor before God, a sin that cannot and should not be tolerated by the body of Christ.  My feelings toward the entire situation can best be summed up by the following Bible passage:

Early in the morning he came again to the temple. All the people came to him, and he sat down and taught them. The scribes and the Pharisees brought a woman who had been caught in adultery, and placing her in the midst  they said to him, “Teacher, this woman has been caught in the act of adultery. Now in the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women. So what do you say?”  This they said to test him, that they might have some charge to bring against him. Jesus bent down and wrote with his finger on the ground.   And as they continued to ask him, he stood up and said to them, “Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone at her.”   And once more he bent down and wrote on the ground.   But when they heard it, they went away one by one, beginning with the older ones, and Jesus was left alone with the woman standing before him.   Jesus stood up and said to her, “Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?”   She said, “No one, Lord.” And Jesus said, “Neither do I condemn you; go, and from now on sin no more,” (John 8:2-11, ESV).

The woman’s sin was a sin worthy of death in the Hebrew culture.  Mr. Tiller’s sin, though not deemed worthy of death by our culture, is nonetheless the equivalent of sinfulness in the eyes of God.  The problem is that none of us meet the requirements necessary to be ruled worthy of being George Tiller’s executioner.  Was he a murderer?  Without a doubt.  Was he helping to perpetuate a mass murder of ridiculous proportions?  Certainly.  George Tiller was one of many hands dirtied by the blood of our nation’s innocent babes, the unborn souls who have never had the opportunity even to breathe the fresh air outside the womb.  For this, he was worthy of death.  However, consider also the words of Jesus:

“You have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not murder; and whoever murders will be liable to judgment.’   But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever says, ‘You fool!’ will be liable to the hell of fire, (Matthew 5:21-22).

Even those who have even reached the point of being angry at others are just as guilty of murder as someone who kills someone in cold blood.  In this truth is both the judgment and the relief of the gospel.  The judgment is that this standard is impossibly high for us to keep.  One is not capable of being this perfect.  The relief is that we don’t have to, because the finished work is on the shoulders of Jesus Christ.  Therefore, let no men be judge and jury, for that is the job of Christ Jesus alone.  It is the message Jesus gave to us both in the Sermon on the Mount and in the passage in John.  It is a hallmark of Jesus’ message that our sins have made us worthy of death, but that judgment belongs to the One who stands without sin, which is Christ the Lord alone.  Therefore, while Mr. Tiller’s works and deeds were an abomination worthy of death before the Lord, his killer likewise will answer to the Holy One of Israel.

It is my prayer for America that rather than debating the two sides of this issue, we would instead figure out a way to end the holocaust of abortion so that the blood of those who ARE truly innocent on our society are given a chance to be born and develop, possibly to change the world for the better.  For Mr. Tiller’s family, I offer my condolences that they lost a husband and a father.  To the would-be parents who enlisted the services of George Tiller to end their pregnancies, I pray for them to receive the mercy and love of God, to repent from their sins, and perhaps reconcile themselves to God with the realization that they will again see their lost little ones on the other side of the Eastern Gate.  For Mr. Tiller, I pray that his transition to the afterlife came with a reconciliation to the Lord his God, and that he is now experiencing the joy divine of living out eternity in the presence of both our Loving Father and those whom he took their lives.  There is no more expression of God’s love and reconciliation than that all wrongs will be righted and that all men who bow the knee to the Lord our God will experience reunion even with those that they potentially harmed.






Alpha and Omega?

29 05 2009

Q. If The LORD is `The Alpha AND The Omega`…He is the beginning AND the end…Does that mean since there WAS a beginning, there WILL be an end?

A. There are a couple of factors to look at in Jesus’ designation of Himself as the Alpha and the Omega.   While it could certainly be taken at face value that Christ was identifying Himself as the first and last/beginning and end, He may also have been using the alphabet reference for a different purpose.  Consider that all knowledge is, in some way, formulated by the alphabet.  Therefore, by identifying Himself as Alpha and Omega, He may very well be using that imagery to establish Himself not just as beginning and end, but the bearer of all true knowledge.  By claiming this position, He is not just making a statement of omnipotence (beginning and end), but also omniscience (the bearer of all knowledge).

With that being said, to answer your question, there most definitely will be an end.  There is an end not in the sense of a cessation of existence, but an end to the things of the present.  Time will be ended in the eternal state.  Jesus will physically return to the earth to set up His earthly kingdom, which will lead into the eternal state which will culminate in a New Heaven and a New Earth.  In Revelation 21, John says “Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and the sea was no more,” (Revelation 21:1).  Also, with the eternal state will come an existence devoid of the Adamic curse on mankind.  Revelation 21:3 says that “I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, ‘Behold, the dwelling place of God is with man.  He will dwell with them, and they will be his people, and God Himself will be with them as their God.  He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death will be no more, neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain anymore, for the former things have passed away,” (Revelation 21:3, 4).

With these things in mind, the answer to your question would be that there will be an end to the current world system and current ecosystem.  Every human condition tied to the curse brought upon us by Adam will cease to affect us (death, disease, the cursed conditions of the ground, etc.).  Instead, we will then live eternally with God in our very presence.  So while there will be an end, it is certainly an end to be anticipating and not dreading.

provided to www.gotquestions.org





Bart Ehrman’s Gospel Harmonization Challenge

3 05 2009
The Risen Christ as spoken of in the four Gospels.

The Risen Christ as spoken of in the four Gospels.

I recently received a comment from a reader telling me that Professor Bart Ehrman likes to challenge his students to write a harmonization of the gospels from the resurrection to the ascension without contradicting and without leaving any details out.  Now I am sure, as sure as I am that I am alive, that no matter whether the student gets it right or not, Ehrman I am sure finds a problem because he reads a Bible made entirely out of wood from cover to cover.  However, for those willing to consider that the Gospels really are eyewitness accounts, and therefore will have some differences between the four (if they didn’t, I am sure professor Ehrman would scream PLAGIARISM so loud I could hear it here in the Charlotte area from Chapel Hill), here it is.

Very early in the morning, at that time when it is still dark but the sky has begun to turn to an opalescent purple in the earliest rays of the sun, Mary Magdalene, Mary, the mother of James, Salome, Joanna, and a few other women left out to pay their last respects to their master and teacher.  They had prepared a mixture of spices to anoint the Lord’s body, for even though Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimethea, good men who had no part in the death of Jesus, had anointed the body, the women felt led to perform their own anointing.  Perhaps it was the idea that this Jesus, who had meant so much to them, who had brought such healing and wholeness into their lives, deserved this devotion from his followers, not just from two members of the Sanhedrin.  Whatever the case may be, the women were on the way to the tomb, when the conversation shifted to “Who would move the stone?”  Little did they know, well before they arrived, an earthquake had occurred, the stone had rolled away, and the guards over the tomb had been scared into catatonia.  One of the angels sat upon the top of the stone after revealing their presence to the soldiers, and then the two angels faded from sight as the soldiers lay comatose on the ground.

Mary Magdalene had separated herself from the group of women, perhaps driven by the pain of knowing that the one who had released her from demon possession lay in a cold sepulcher dead.  Continually outpacing the others, she arrives to the tomb several paces ahead of the other women and sees the stone rolled away from the tomb.  The last straw on poor Mary has finally been laid.  Without investigating, without considering what she has seen, she turns and runs toward Jerusalem to the two men that Jesus trusted most, Simon Peter and John, the disciple whom Jesus loved.

The other women, rather than following the panic stricken Mary, continue toward the tomb, and look inside, not sure what to expect.  Once they were all in, they saw that the body was nowhere to be found, and as they stood perplexed, two angels appeared to them in white, shining dazzling clothing, such that left little doubt these men were no men, but rather, they were angels.

One of the angels began to speak to the women, saying “Why do you look for the living among the dead?”  The women continued to be afraid, and the angel speaks again after asking the first question, saying “Do not be afraid! I know you are looking for Jesus the Nazarene, who was crucified.  He is not here, for He has risen, just as He said he would!  See the place where He laid.”  Still dumbfounded, the women continue to be silent.  THIS CAN’T BE!!! Dead men do not rise again from the dead, and their master was certainly dead.  Detecting the lack of belief and trust in the women, the angel begins again, saying “Remember how he told you, while He was still in Galilee that the Son of Man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men, and be crucified, and on the third day rise again?  But go, tell His disciples and Peter, ‘He is going ahead of you to Galilee; you will see Him there just as He told you.’”   With that, the angels disappear from sight.  But the women, still terrified, panic and leave trembling, and said nothing to anyone, since they were afraid.  The women have a feeling of panic mixed with joy.  “Is it possible for this to occur,” they wonder.  Rather than follow the orders of the angel, however, they return to one of their number’s homes.

As this is occurring, Mary Magdalene has made it back to Jerusalem and found Peter and John.  In a panic, she comes to Peter and John and tells them “They have taken away the Lord out of the tomb, and we do not know where they have laid Him.”  Mary had left in such a panic and so distraught, that she merely mentions the opened tomb to the other women and makes no other investigation, so to her, no one knew why that stone was gone.  The other problem with poor Mary was that in her mental state, her only conclusion that she could reach was that someone had stolen Jesus’ body.  Peter and John respond by rushing to the tomb, and though John beats Peter to the tomb, Peter walks in first, notices the wrappings, and then John went in.  John began to believe that Jesus had risen from the dead (before this point, no one thought Jesus would be raised from the dead), and saying nothing, leaves the scene.  Peter leaves the scene, marveling at what had happened, apart from John.

Mary, who up until this point, was lost in her sorrow, lost in trying to get a grip on what was going on, enters the tomb herself.  She sees two angels sitting on the right side of the tomb, where Jesus’ body had previously been laid.  They ask her “Woman, why are you weeping?”  She said to the two “because they have taken away my Lord, and I do not know where they have laid Him.”  Mary still convinced that the only possible explanation, since dead men don’t stop being dead, was that someone had stolen the body.  Now when she said this, she turned around and saw Jesus standing there, and in the grief, the tears, the pain, and the miraculous change from His shattered mortal body to His resurrection body, Mary does not recognize the Lord.  She supposes Him to be a gardener, and Jesus asks her “Woman, why are you weeping?”  Mary says to Him, through her tears in a weak, strained voice, “Sir, if You have carried Him away, tell me where You have laid Him, and I will take Him away.”  Jesus, the LORD of life, the Good Shepherd, says to His disciple one word: “Mary.”  As His sheep know His voice, Mary knew the voice of the lover of her soul, and responded “Rabboni,” a term that means teacher, but was usually used of God Himself by devout Jews.  Jesus tells her, “Do not cling to Me, for I have not yet ascended to My Father; but go to My brethren and say to them, “I am ascending to My Father and your Father, and to My God and your God.”
The excitement of the moment is all over Mary, as thoughts of defeat, loss, and pain melt away to the sheer and utter joy of her Savior being alive again!  She runs to find the other women, who in panic, have fled to one of their own number’s homes and told no one.  Upon hearing the report of Mary Magdalene, they now decide to continue the trip into Jerusalem to tell the eleven (minus Peter and John, who had already gone and seen).  On the way into Jerusalem, Jesus makes another appearance to these women, at which point they all worship Him.  Jesus reiterates the command that had been given earlier and then disregarded, saying “Go and take word to My brethren to leave for Galilee, and there they will see Me.”

The women arrive, recount what has happened to the eleven (again, minus Peter and John, who had gone to the tomb already), and they think the women are crazy.  As these events are occurring, Jesus appears to Peter, who was by himself after leaving the tomb by himself in a state of marvel over the events that had happened.  Peter returns toward Jerusalem to join the eleven and recount what has happened.

As for the guards, when they awoke, they headed back into the city to tell the chief priests all that happened.  The priests gave the soldiers a large sum of money, told them to tell all that the disciples stole the body while they slept, and that the priests would cover up the whole thing with Pilate.  The story was widely circulated among the Jews to account for the empty tomb.
Later in the evening, two disciples are on the road to Emmaus, when Jesus catches up with them and walks with them on the way to Emmaus, talking with the two about the events that happened in Jerusalem.  The two tell Him what has happened, and He responds by explaining to them from the scriptures that these things must happen to the Son of Man.  They reach Emmaus, and Jesus begins to leave, but they ask Him to stay.  He sits with them to break bread, and as He breaks the bread, they realize:  IT IS THE MASTER!!!!!  He then disappears, and the two disciples head to Jerusalem to tell the others.

“YOU WON’T BELIEVE THIS!!!!”, as they begin to recount to the disciples (minus Thomas, who had now left the locked upper room), the disciples confirm by announcing that He had appeared to Simon Peter.  As they are all talking, Jesus appears in their midst, and says “Peace be with you.”  Everyone is in panic, terrified, thinking that He may be a ghost.  Even those who had seen Him already were concerned, because though they had seen, it was still a lot to process.  Jesus, seeing them in their state of weakness, offers proof that He is a real person:  a plate of broiled fish, which He proceeds to eat.  He also offers His own body for examination, at which point they believe.  He speaks to them, breathes upon them, and says “If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained.”  Then he vanishes again from their midst.  The disciples tell Thomas once he returns the great news.  Thomas responds by saying “Unless I see in His hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the print of the nails, and put my hand into His side, I will not believe.”

The next Sunday, Thomas was with the disciples and Jesus appeared again, demonstrating Himself to Thomas and showing Thomas His wounds.  With these events, the disciples, emboldened, amazed, departed from Jerusalem and returned to their hometown of Galilee.  In the meantime, Jesus appeared to over 500 witnesses at one time, to His brother James, and again to the disciples at the Sea of Galilee while they were fishing.  Jesus also appeared to the gathered disciples on the mountain which He had earlier told them to meet at, and Jesus spoke to them, saying, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age.”  He then disappeared from in their midst.  Some had worshipped Him, but many were absolutely perplexed at how the man they knew to have died to be alive and tangible again.

As Shavuot (First Fruits, or Pentecost, as we would know it) was approaching, the disciples returned to Jerusalem, as Shavuot is one of three festivals that all men had to come to Jerusalem to celebrate.  They convene again in Jerusalem for Shavuot in the upper room, when Jesus appeared to them again and spent more time with them. “These are My words, which I spoke to you while I was still with you, that all things which are written about Me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled.”  Then He opened their minds to understand the Scriptures, and He said to them, “Thus it is written, that the Christ would suffer and rise again from the dead the third day, and that repentance for the forgiveness of sins would be proclaimed in His name to all the nations beginning from Jerusalem.  You are witnesses of these things.  And behold, I am sending forth the promise of My Father upon you; but you are to stay in the city until you are clothed with power from on high.”
Jesus led them all out to the Mount of Olives, near Bethany, telling them “This is what you heard from Me; for John baptized with water, but you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit not many days from now”. When they had all arrived together, they asked Him “Lord, at this time are You restoring the kingdom to Israel?”  Jesus responded “It is not for you to know times or periods that the Father has set by His own authority.  But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be My witnesses in Jerusalem, in all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth.”  After He said this, they watched as He parted from them, ascending into heaven.  Two men in white clothes appeared, saying “Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking up into heaven?  This Jesus, who has been taken from you into heaven, will come in the same way that you have seen Him going into heaven.”  At this, they returned to Jerusalem and returned to the upper room.

The eyewitness accounts of the Gospels can be combined together to create quite a stunningly accurate and detail filled account of the events of that incredible time period when the resurrected Christ appeared to His followers.  There are some portions of the Gospels that may at first glance seem contradictory, but instead of contradicting, they lend actual credence to the idea that these were eyewitness reports.  I attempt to explain them in order.

1.     Who all went to the tomb?  Mary Magdalene?  Salome?  Mary?  WHO!!!!???
A.     Mary Magdalene, Mary Mother of James, Salome, Joanna, and other women went.  John mentions only Mary Magdalene in his account because she is the focal point for John.  We know that more than just Mary went, though, even from John’s gospel, because in Greek Mary says “We don’t know where they have taken Him.”

2.     Was it dark?  Was it at sunrise?
A.     Ever notice that, in the very first rays of sunrise, the sky is just beginning to turn light purple in the east, but it is still dark?  Yeah, that’s about what time they went.

3.    When did the earthquake, soldiers falling down, and angels happen?
A.     The earthquake happened before the women arrived at the tomb.  How far before, I don’t know, but it must have been some time.  There is no mention of the guards in the other gospels, so they may have already come to, discovered the body gone, and went back to the priests.

4.     If Mary Magdalene was with the women who went, why did she run back to Peter after being  told by the angel that Jesus had risen?
A.     Mary may have gotten there merely moments before the others, saw the opened tomb, screamed or told the others, then ran quickly back to get Peter and John.

5.   How many angels were at the tomb?
A.     There were two.  One did the speaking.  The mention of two angels necessarily means that there is one.

6.     What did the women do upon finding out about Jesus’ resurrection?
A.     Like any rational human being, they freaked right out.  Matthew says they were joyful and fearful at the same time.  They were so messed up from the experience that I would surmise they headed out and rendezvoused at some other landmark, not obeying the command of the angels.  That also gives a window for Mary Magdalene to get Peter and John to the tomb without running into the other women to find out the story from them.

7.     Why didn’t Mary know what had happened and still had to ask the two angels what happened to Jesus’ body?
A.     Again, Mary was not with the women when they went in the tomb.  Again, since there was no dialog traded between John and Peter for her to understand, and they both left in stunned amazement, there was no information transfer.  Therefore, Mary stepped into the tomb to see for herself what happened.

8.     How did the other women see Jesus on the way to Jerusalem?
A.     I surmise that after Mary Magdalene encountered the risen Jesus, she immediately went to find the other women, since that was the party she went to the tomb with.  Therefore, she would want them to know that Jesus was not dead, and His body had not been stolen, but He was alive.  Upon giving them this information, they all regrouped and went into the city, but on the way, they encountered the risen Christ.  Jesus reiterated the command the angel had given the women earlier.

9.     The women told the disciples, and they thought the women were crazy.  Peter went to the tomb.  But, didn’t Peter already go to the tomb?
A.     Peter had indeed already gone to the tomb.  Luke is telling the story as an anecdotal account.  Peter had already gone to the tomb earlier, and Luke is indeed affirming Peter’s experience.  Effectively, the Peter account was being added to refute the question of the women’s sanity.

10.     Why were there two great commissions, one given on a mountain in Galilee, one in Jerusalem telling the disciples not to leave the city?
A.    Simple.  Matthew records a commission given to the disciples in the time period between the time they went back to Galilee after Passover and before they came back to Jerusalem for Shavuot (Pentecost).  This commission to baptize and witness was given to the disciples on the very mountain Jesus had told them to go to.  The second one, recorded in Luke, was given once they had returned to Jerusalem for Pentecost.  There were three holidays that all men had to be in Jerusalem to celebrate, and two of those are Passover and Pentecost.  That explains the return to Galilee and hence, two times Jesus spoke to them in this manner.  The speech recorded in Luke details the coming of the Holy Spirit, as well, which they were to stay in Jerusalem until the Holy Spirit had come.  Why?  Simple as well.  Many people would be gathered into Jerusalem for Pentecost from around the Roman Empire, just as they were for Passover.  The disciples would have thousands to preach the gospel to, who would then take it home to their own places.

I realize that in a wooden, literal reading of the Bible, men like Bart Ehrman would say that I have harmonized contradictory accounts, and that the Bible can’t be harmonized.  My response to that would be two-fold.  First, these are supposed to be fast moving eyewitness accounts of the high points of Jesus’ life.  You can say all the words Jesus said in the Gospel recordings in two hours.  Do you really think Jesus only said two hours worth of stuff in three years?  Don’t be daft.  Second, those who argue that it simply cannot be harmonized are doing so only from the standpoint of needing to not accept it.  They are simply skeptical and can’t be convinced no matter what you say.

Apologetics is not an evangelism tool in the sense that apologetics will win someone over to faith in Christ.  Apologetics is a tool to provide believers with the truth of why they believe what they believe.  Our life witness and the witness of the Holy Spirit is what saves the souls of men.

I invite you to read over this, and if there are any thoughts that the records may still contradict, please, bring them to me.  I am not an arrogant jerk who is unwilling to retrace his work.  I just have ultimate faith that the gospel records are inerrant and am willing to defend that belief.





Amos and the Plumb Line

2 05 2009

A modern day plumb line, much like the illustration from Amos.

A modern day plumb line, much like the illustration from Amos.

“This is what he showed me:  behold, the Lord was standing beside a wall built with a plumb line, with a plumb line in his hand.  And the LORD said to me, “Amos, what do you see?”  And I said, “A plumb line.”  Then the LORD said, “Behold, I am setting a plumb line in the midst of my people Israel;  I will never again pass by them;” (Amos 7:7-8) ESV

The plumb line was the ancient equivalent of a level, so to speak.  When a builder built a wall, this line, which had a weight at the end known as a plummet (the term plumb comes from the Latin “plumbum,” meaning lead.  These tools were originally made with a lead weight), would indicate whether or not the walls of the structure were straight.  Obviously, in order for a structure to be sound, it needed straight walls.

The metaphor behind the plumb line is this:  God’s plumb line is His standard.  For the Israelites, it was His covenant law.  The wall upon which God was standing was a wall constructed true to that plumb, or one that was straight and conformed to His measurements.  He now stood on this perfect wall with His plumb line (The covenant He made with Israel) ready to measure Israel.  The importance of the plumb line is this:  if a wall was not straight (true to plumb), then that wall would be torn down, as it would not stand.  Israel would not, obviously, measure true to plumb, and God was no longer going to “pass by them”, which could best be interpreted as “looking past their iniquity.”  As history proved, God was true to His word and Israel was defeated by the Assyrians, thus fulfilling God’s promise to destroy the wall that did not measure true to plumb.

While we no longer are measured by the plumb line of the Sinai Covenant, God still has measures by which we are measured.  Those standards are too high for us to meet them alone.  We need the sacrifice of Jesus, and the acceptance of Him as our Savior.  Otherwise, we will meet with the same fate Israel faced.  We will eventually be judged for our works and our deeds, and if we do not accept the sacrifice of Jesus upon the cross, we will then be judged on our own merit, which is not a good thing.

What would your plumb line look like?  If you have accepted Christ, the walls you build will be “true to plumb,” not by your own efforts, but by the effort of the one who was, who is, and is to come.

provided to www.gotquestions.org





Study to Show Yourself Approved

30 04 2009

I sometimes shudder at the effect the most uneducated of us can have in society.  By this, I mean that, typically, we as Christians are represented by those who are the poorest representatives of Christians.  It is sad to know that many American Christians are biblically illiterate, and the situation does not seem to have any signs of hope on the horizon.

I am not saying that everyone must be a highly educated professor of apologetics and discernment.  I am only wondering if it is too much to ask for Christians to somewhat diligently read their bible to the point that when that same bible is attacked by the world, Christians are more than able to stand proudly and defend their faith and the holy scripture.  Paul commended the Bereans for seeking after truth.  He told Timothy to be diligent to show himself approved as a workman who does not need to be ashamed, accurately handling the word of truth.  John encouraged his readers to test the spirits.  In Isaiah 1, God says “come let us reason together.”  In Hosea, God laments that His people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.

The common thread here is this:  God wants us to use our brains.  God wants us to read the scriptures, work through the materials therein, and learn about God and His word.  We can’t truly begin to know God until we have taken the time to figure out what He is saying to us in His word.





Moral Relativism and Absurdity

27 04 2009

I have a real problem with the whole “what’s true for you isn’t true for me” gang.  It’s not that I want to impose my ways on anyone, I don’t want to make everyone see things my way, I just want everyone to think logically for a moment.  I want everyone who goes for the whole moral relativism deal to stop for a moment, be intellectual honest with yourselves, and say “Really, I know it makes no sense, I just claim moral relativism because it give me license to do what I want with my life.”

Consider for a moment this succinct little statement: There are no absolute truths.  Now, let’s think that through.  If that statement is true, then there are no absolute truths…EXCEPT THAT THERE ARE NO TRUTHS.  Therefore, there is an absolute truth, which makes that statement false. Therefore, logically, there at least exist absolute truths.  They may be few and far between, but there are absolute truths.

The way people argue for the lack of absolute truths is usually by qualitatively changing the issues.  The qualifications end up becoming feelings, so that rather than talking about what is true, we instead discuss our perceptions.  For example, I could see the sky and think it is blue.  My dad is colorblind, so he may not see the same thing.  If we determine truth solely off of the two of us, we may never reach consensus.  Regardless, however, of our perception, there is an absolute truth behind what color the sky is.  One could use a spectroscope to determine a value that corresponds to a color, and we therefore have an absolute truth regarding the color of the sky, regardless of what me or my colorblind dad say.

Arguing that truth is relative and that truth is what we feel it is is like saying I am sick because I feel like a have a cold.  No, you are sick because of the presence of bacteria or viruses.  Otherwise, you are speaking of perceptions, which are different from truth.

I have a great idea.  I think maybe everyone who feels that they can define their own truth should take  a step back and think for a moment about why they believe such a flawed system.  I think it has more to do with the fact that we are a godless culture that seeks nothing more than independence from our Creator, and moral relativism is just the escape hatch to do so.  Through the wonder of perception, we can then remove truth from the equation, dash accountability to the ground, and live as senseless, primal beasts who just happen to occupy the top of the food chain.  This, then, is the true aim of moral relativism- give me the maximum freedom I can have coupled with the minimum responsibility toward myself and others.





Obedience or Excellence?

25 04 2009
Samuel Appearing to King Saul before the Battle of Gilboa

Samuel Appearing to King Saul before the Battle of Gilboa

Would you rather be obedient or be excellent?  Which one between the two of obedience and excellence are more highly esteemed in our society?  I have asked friends this question before and it never fails that they respond by saying that excellence is the preferred standard.  Excellence is a 4 out of 5 score on a job review, outdone only by the score of Outstanding.  Excellence is the standard that we see in play in today’s society.  Companies aim for excellence in their products, their delivery method, their marketing.  Employees aim for excellence in their job performance, valuing a performance that ensures themselves a spot in the upper echelon of their respective companies.

Obedience is a far cry from excellence in our eyes.  Obedience is simply following orders.  Obedience means when someone tells you to empty the trash, the trash gets emptied.  Obedience is simply being willful to do the bidding and commands of another.  Obedience does not come with a competition level.  You either are or obedient or you aren’t.  There’s no competition against other people.  Obedience is purely the measure of whether or not you listen to the commands of your superiors.

By the world’s standards, obedience is nothing more than following orders.  Obedience is a 3 out of 5 rating on a job evaluation.  My question, though, is this:  Does God judge our lives by our excellence or by our obedience?  Which pleases God more, to see us excel when compared to other human beings, or does it please God more to see us obedient to His eternal will?  Why not look at a person like Saul to see the difference and discern the will of the LORD?

Saul was, by all standards, excellent.  Physically, he was excellent.  He was used by God in a variety of ways.  He had all the marks of excellence.  By our earthly standards, Saul was by far an excellent person.  Let us read what Samuel says about Saul:

“There was a man of Benjamin whose name was Kish, the son of Abiel, son of Zeror, son of Becorath, son of Aphiah, a Benjaminite, a man of wealth. And he had a son whose name was Saul, a handsome young man. There was not a man among the people of Israel more handsome than he. From his shoulders upward he was taller than any of the people.” (1 Samuel 9:1-2)

However, Saul tempered that excellence with utter disobedience.  Here are two examples of Saul’s disobedience:

1)  Saul offered a sacrifice at Gilgal after Samuel had told him to wait seven days for Samuel to come and do it.

This may seem like  a ridiculous affront, but consider this:  Samuel was  a prophet of God, who was a mouthpiece of the Lord to Israel at this time.  Therefore, while Saul held civil authority, in the manners of religion and worship, the priest/prophet was the one in authority.  Also, consider that Saul’s disobedience then was not just disobedience to Samuel, but to God as well.

2) Saul didn’t kill all the Amalekites as God asked, but left King Agag and all the livestock.

Saul had been told to kill all of the Amalekites because they were evil and were a stench in the nostrils of the LORD.  Rather than follow orders, Saul kept King Agag as a prisoner of war, did not eliminate the entire population, and even went so far as to keep the livestock for himself and his army.  This was the final disobedience for the LORD.  The kingdom was taken from Saul and given to David.

Saul was excellent.  But he failed in the area of obedience.  Therefore, he did not stay king for very long, and when he did in shame in the Battle of Gilboa, his kingdom passed into the hands

David Playing for King Saul

David Playing for King Saul

of David.  Many of us feel that our excellence is pleasing to God.  We feel that we are doing well in some areas, not so much in others, and therefore, as long as we balance our bad with our good and are better than most people, we will be safe.  We compare other people to ourselves and allow our standards to be fixed by earthly standards.  The standard we need to aim for is the standard of 100% obedience to God.  God’s only standard by which to measure us is whether or not we obey Him.  Jesus said  “Why do you call me ‘Lord, Lord,’ and not do what I tell you?” (Luke 6:46). He also said “If you love Me, keep My commandments” (John 14:15). To reemphasize, He said “Whoever has my commandments and keeps them, he it is who loves me. And he who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I will love him and manifest myself to him” (John 14:21).  It should be obvious where God’s standard is.  God’s standard is obedience, precisely because it does

not measure itself against other people.  You either are obedient, or you are not.  There are no varying standards of obedience.  It’s not a curve.  It’s either there or it’s not.

Is there somewhere in your life where you are trading the obedience to the LORD for excellence in comparison to others?  Do you ever catch yourself saying “Well, at least I’m better than that guy!”  If you do, you are trading obedience for excellence.    I won’t print it here, but Psalm 119 is a praise of all that is holy in God’s law.  It is a great way to get yourself in touch with the love of God’s laws and to realize that obedience to His statutes is where it is at.





Can We Lose Our Salvation?

23 04 2009
180px-christ_carrying_the_cross_1580

Can We Lose Our Salvation?

My father, a staunch Methodist, is purely convinced in the belief that Christians can lose their salvation.  His friend is an Independent Baptist who believes that our salvation is immutable.  Which one is right?

Well, the witness of scripture has this to say:

“My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me.   I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of my hand.   My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all, and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father’s hand. ” (John 10:28-29)

“For I am sure that neither death nor life, nor angels nor rulers, nor things present nor things to come, nor powers,  nor height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord.” (Romans 8:39-39)

” And I am sure of this, that he who began a good work in you will bring it to completion at the day of Jesus Christ.” (Philippians 1:6)

Through these verses, I think the groundwork is laid in scripture that once we have been saved unto eternal life, we are then given that eternal life forever.  One of the texts that are offered as proof that it is in fact possible to believe and then fall away is Hebrews 6:4:

“For it is impossible, in the case of those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, and have shared in the Holy Spirit,  and have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, and then have fallen away, to restore them again to repentance, since they are crucifying once again the Son of God to their own harm and holding him up to contempt. ” (Hebrews 6:4-6)

The problems with using this verse to prove that salvation can be lost are numerous.  First, consider the audience:  Hebrew Christians who may have experienced somewhat the power of God through the ministry of the early apostles.  They may have experienced some of the goodness of God, may even have taken part in some ministry of the early church, but then fell back into Jewish laws and regulations as a saving grace.  Therefore, they never really accepted the free gift of salvation, but merely had the appearance of those who did.  For those who would then fall away after only experiencing a taste and failing to fully give themselves to Christ, the return to life under the law was, in fact, a mockery of the atoning death of Christ, and are then holding Him in contempt and basically requiring Him to crucify Himself anew since they have decided to return to the old laws.  Therefore, this is not proof that Christians can fall away, but that there are those who profess belief in Christ, trust in Christ, then fall away.  They therefore never trusted Christ for their salvation to begin with.

I don’t believe that Christians can lose their salvation.  I believe that Christians who fall away from the faith and do not return were never really Christians in the first place.  Otherwise, Jesus would have been proven a liar when He said that no one could snatch His own from His hand.